To Win in the Marketplace, Win First in the Workplace

by Kelly Riggs on February 18, 2010

Competition is fierce in consumer packaged goods (CPG), the industry sector that includes food and beverages, footwear and apparel, tobacco, and cleaning products (things that get used by consumers and replaced rather frequently). Product innovation is constant, space on store shelves is limited, and brand awareness is paramount. Even in a good economy, business in CPG can be tough sledding, and 2008 wasn’t one of the good years – a struggling economy and depressed consumer spending led to a decrease in median shareholder returns of 25% for consumer packaged goods companies.

In the midst of this carnage, Campbell’s (makers of several household brands, notably Campbell’s Soup) turned in a surprising 7% increase in net earnings per share in FY 2008. In fact, beginning the second year after Douglas Conant became CEO of Campbell’s in 2001, the company has marched steadily ahead – from $6.13 billion in revenue in 2002 to $8 billion in 2008.

In a February 2010 interview with Gallup Management Journal, Conant discussed the steps he took to get the company moving – a process that took about eighteen months and included the replacement of 300 (of 350) top managers.

I strongly believe that you can’t win in the marketplace unless you win first in the workplace. If you don’t have a winning culture inside, it’s hard to compete in the very tough world outside… You can’t ask employees to achieve extraordinary results if they’re not fully engaged. That’s why we focus a great deal on getting the workplace right so that people are engaged and proactive – so that people are moving forward arm in arm and competing with a spring in their step. As they become more engaged, they find ways to win in the marketplace that are sustainable.

Conant has seized on a crucial and profound principle in business: employee satisfaction and customer satisfaction are directly linked. In fact, it is fair to say that your customer’s satisfaction in the marketplace will rise and fall with your employee’s satisfaction in the workplace. Sure, I know this seems somewhat obvious (or completely obvious), but it is still the rare company that invests in leadership training for those managers who are responsible for employee job satisfaction.

Workplace Development

Training for managers? Why not training for the disgruntled employee? Actually, that is the first thought at most companies. So, perhaps knowing where the problem lies is the real challenge. When employees become disenchanted in the workplace, according to Leigh Branham, most of the time the issue is an ineffective manager. In his book The 7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave, Branham dissected the responses of 19,700 employees who left their jobs and discovered that 70 percent left their positions for reasons directly attributable to their immediate supervisor or manager.

However, disgruntled employees rarely leads to management training. Instead, companies install casual dress Fridays, monthly birthday parties, and any number of other feel-good ideas. Don’t misunderstand, there is nothing wrong with any of those things per se; they just won’t make the problem of poor leadership go away. That’s the real challenge.

Employee engagement (employee job satisfaction) is a measure of how much an employee feels connected to the company. Are they bought in? Do they enjoy work? Do they trust the boss? Are they passionate about doing their best work? Research clearly shows that all of these things – and many more – are directly impacted by an employee’s direct manager or supervisor. Unfortunately, that manager or supervisor is rarely trained to function as a leader – to develop people, to communicate effectively, to inspire and engage. Instead, bright and capable employees are promoted to management simply because they are…well, bright and capable. They get things done. They take responsibility. They make things happen.

As managers (or supervisors), however, they come face-to-face with the brutal fact that the toughest part of their new job is dealing with the employees. Without any preparation or training for the position, they are left to figure things out for themselves, which creates frustration for both managers and employees.

Here’s an example: Ask any manager if they have ever been trained to create trust with their employees. It is likely that they have not, but look at Conant’s observation about the importance of creating trust with employees:

“…once you earn people’s trust, you have permission to do some amazing things. Trust gives you the permission to give people direction, get everyone aligned, and give them the energy to go get the job done. Trust enables you to execute with excellence and produce extraordinary results. As you execute with excellence and deliver on your commitments, trust becomes easier to inspire, creating a flywheel of performance.”

Conant observes that trust is a critical part of workplace performance. As a manager, then, it is critical to understand that marketplace performance ultimately is a function of trust. Trust leads to workplace engagement and engaged employees create satisfied customers. Starbucks CEO Howard Shultz made this point years ago when he said, “You can’t expect your employees to exceed the expectations of your customers if you don’t exceed the employees’ expectations of management.”

To win in the marketplace, it is essential to win first in the workplace.

{ 0 comments }

Should You Create “Undercover Employees?”

by Kelly Riggs on February 5, 2010

“I would love to see the boss do my job!”

Some employees are getting that chance. Undercover Boss, which debuts on February 7 after the Super Bowl, is the newest television show to join the onslaught of reality show programming. The idea is simple enough – take a corporate CEO and put him in one of the front line jobs in the company.  The objective is to provide the CEO with a glimpse of the everyday challenges associated with the jobs that drive the company forward. No, not administrative or sales positions, but the primary jobs that define the company’s work.

A good idea, though not necessarily a new one, as pointed out in a recent Harvard Business Review blog post:

More than forty years ago, Robert Townsend, the former head of Avis Rent-a-Car described how he had his executives spend time every month working behind a rental counter, and similar versions of this activity were documented many years ago in HBR and elsewhere. They serve as valuable, first-hand reminders for managers of how difficult certain jobs are, how hard their people work, and how silly or unfair some of their company’s rules can be. And that is where the opportunity lies.

No doubt, it is a great idea to have managers – especially executives – spend time doing the jobs they are responsible for managing. At the very least, a close observation of those jobs would reveal policies, procedures, rules, or methods that should be addressed.

Trading Places (in reverse)

Interestingly enough, an article crossed my desk recently that discussed a completely opposite approach – having an employee go undercover as the CEO. Well, sort of. Here is the idea as suggested by Mark Pincus, founder and chief executive of Zynga:

I’d turn people into C.E.O.’s. One thing I did at my second company was to put white sticky sheets on the wall, and I put everyone’s name on one of the sheets, and I said, “By the end of the week, everybody needs to write what you’re C.E.O. of, and it needs to be something really meaningful.” And that way, everyone knows who’s C.E.O. of what, and they know whom to ask instead of me. And it was really effective. People liked it. And there was nowhere to hide.

This is an interesting idea, and works on a number of levels. First, people like to have some control over their own destiny; to have some say-so about something of consequence on the job. It is one of the reasons why certain employees can be guilty of hoarding information or resources, or carving out an area of responsibility and protecting it like an endangered species. In pursuing some meaning or purpose in their work, or, in some cases, just attempting to provide a level of job security for themselves, those employees try to create a layer of control and authority that may not exist.

Making an employee the “CEO” over something specific is one way to provide the purpose that employee is seeking. Certainly, she should be adequately trained to perform the role. She should understand the expectations for the role. She should comprehend the impact of her role on other people and departments. Ultimately, however, by passing the authority and responsibility (within defined limits) for a particular item or area of responsibility to the employee, and designating her as the “CEO” of that area, is an excellent way to create value for her as a person and an employee.

Second, people develop confidence in themselves and create satisfaction in their work when they have the ability to achieve something noteworthy. At the same time, employees vary in the level of talent they bring to a job, so in assuming the title of “CEO” over something that fits their skill-set and talent level, they have the opportunity to create personal success and directly observe their own contribution to the success of the team.

A word of caution: It is a good idea, but like so many ideas, proper execution is critical. An effective leader will prepare the employee to assume the role of “CEO” rather than simply apply the title. Promotion without preparation is the key to disaster.

{ 0 comments }

I Manage, Therefore I Have Meetings

“A meeting is an event where minutes are taken and hours are wasted.”   …Milton Berle
Somewhere, there is an unwritten rule that says all managers are required to conduct limitless meetings. It’s in the Manager Handbook or something. You get promoted to management, you are required by law to conduct lots and lots of meetings. Maybe [...]

Read the post here...

What is Your Culture Worth?

Simple question: Do employees tend to do better work in a demanding workplace culture that is positive, encouraging, and empowering, or will they do better work in a demanding workplace that is negative, critical, and constricting?
Notice that in either cases the workplace environment is demanding; i.e., expectations for performance are high, employees are accountable to [...]

Read the post here...

Eliminating Excuses (and Improving Performance)

The first thing that I learned was results matter. At the end of the day, no matter how much somebody respects your intellect or your capabilities or how much they like you, in the end it is all about results in the business context. You have to be able to demonstrate that you have proven [...]

Read the post here...

Rate Yourself on These Critical Competencies

Annual reviews are designed as a part of an overall performance management process. During the typical annual review, managers are usually assessed in a number of mission-critical competencies. Unfortunately, though well-intentioned, the typical review contains a number of flaws.
First, adequate training in assessment areas is not always forthcoming. In fact, specific competencies are not always [...]

Read the post here...

Create a Clear Mission

In a November 2009 Fast Company article entitled “How to Write a Mission Statement That Isn’t Dumb,” Nancy Lublin writes, “Mission statements are like corporate Hallmark cards. Often written in a bland cursive font and plastered conspicuously at headquarters, these aspiring epigrams are pretty words in Air Supply-like rhythm.” Need proof? Here’s a fairly standard [...]

Read the post here...

A Manager’s Biggest Priority is…

If you insist on doing everything, that is exactly what will happen, so quit whining about your employees’ lack of initiative. The team will likely suffer high turnover; employees will tell you they got a better offer, but they really just want to work for someone that will give them a chance to grow and develop. The team will not be innovative, because the “really good” ideas always come from you.

Read the post here...

How Effective Are You at Managing Performance?

News flash: In terms of workplace performance, employees aren’t all the same.  Yup…bet you had no idea.
Of course, it would be nice if they were all the same – preferably awesome. Unfortunately, we have all seen the employee who has been with the company for ten years but really doesn’t have ten years experience, [...]

Read the post here...

Which Part of “Communication” Don’t You Understand?

How important is it for a manager to be an effective communicator in the workplace? The most recent data suggests that, for corporate recruiters looking to hire for management positions, communication skills rank at the top of the list of core competencies managers need in the workplace:
Good communication skills outrank other core business competencies as [...]

Read the post here...