Should You Create “Undercover Employees?”

by Kelly Riggs on February 5, 2010

“I would love to see the boss do my job!”

Some employees are getting that chance. Undercover Boss, which debuts on February 7 after the Super Bowl, is the newest television show to join the onslaught of reality show programming. The idea is simple enough – take a corporate CEO and put him in one of the front line jobs in the company.  The objective is to provide the CEO with a glimpse of the everyday challenges associated with the jobs that drive the company forward. No, not administrative or sales positions, but the primary jobs that define the company’s work.

A good idea, though not necessarily a new one, as pointed out in a recent Harvard Business Review blog post:

More than forty years ago, Robert Townsend, the former head of Avis Rent-a-Car described how he had his executives spend time every month working behind a rental counter, and similar versions of this activity were documented many years ago in HBR and elsewhere. They serve as valuable, first-hand reminders for managers of how difficult certain jobs are, how hard their people work, and how silly or unfair some of their company’s rules can be. And that is where the opportunity lies.

No doubt, it is a great idea to have managers – especially executives – spend time doing the jobs they are responsible for managing. At the very least, a close observation of those jobs would reveal policies, procedures, rules, or methods that should be addressed.

Trading Places (in reverse)

Interestingly enough, an article crossed my desk recently that discussed a completely opposite approach – having an employee go undercover as the CEO. Well, sort of. Here is the idea as suggested by Mark Pincus, founder and chief executive of Zynga:

I’d turn people into C.E.O.’s. One thing I did at my second company was to put white sticky sheets on the wall, and I put everyone’s name on one of the sheets, and I said, “By the end of the week, everybody needs to write what you’re C.E.O. of, and it needs to be something really meaningful.” And that way, everyone knows who’s C.E.O. of what, and they know whom to ask instead of me. And it was really effective. People liked it. And there was nowhere to hide.

This is an interesting idea, and works on a number of levels. First, people like to have some control over their own destiny; to have some say-so about something of consequence on the job. It is one of the reasons why certain employees can be guilty of hoarding information or resources, or carving out an area of responsibility and protecting it like an endangered species. In pursuing some meaning or purpose in their work, or, in some cases, just attempting to provide a level of job security for themselves, those employees try to create a layer of control and authority that may not exist.

Making an employee the “CEO” over something specific is one way to provide the purpose that employee is seeking. Certainly, she should be adequately trained to perform the role. She should understand the expectations for the role. She should comprehend the impact of her role on other people and departments. Ultimately, however, by passing the authority and responsibility (within defined limits) for a particular item or area of responsibility to the employee, and designating her as the “CEO” of that area, is an excellent way to create value for her as a person and an employee.

Second, people develop confidence in themselves and create satisfaction in their work when they have the ability to achieve something noteworthy. At the same time, employees vary in the level of talent they bring to a job, so in assuming the title of “CEO” over something that fits their skill-set and talent level, they have the opportunity to create personal success and directly observe their own contribution to the success of the team.

A word of caution: It is a good idea, but like so many ideas, proper execution is critical. An effective leader will prepare the employee to assume the role of “CEO” rather than simply apply the title. Promotion without preparation is the key to disaster.

{ 0 comments }

I Manage, Therefore I Have Meetings

by Kelly Riggs on January 19, 2010

“A meeting is an event where minutes are taken and hours are wasted.”   …Milton Berle

Somewhere, there is an unwritten rule that says all managers are required to conduct limitless meetings. It’s in the Manager Handbook or something. You get promoted to management, you are required by law to conduct lots and lots of meetings. Maybe there’s a quota – like a Merit Badge or something.

The challenge is that no one teaches people how to conduct effective meetings. Yes, you know it’s true – you sit in these train wrecks on a regular basis. You are either the victim or the culprit (or both), but you are spending way too much time in meetings. If, however, on the wildly off-chance you don’t have to participate in a lot of bad meetings, you will never know the pain…

Don’t get me wrong – some meetings are necessary. Occasionally, one is actually productive! Most meetings, however, are only marginally beneficial, and many are a complete waste of time. They start late. They are poorly led. They are long on ideas and short on execution. There is no follow-up or accountability. Good ideas are labeled “risky” while bad ideas are pondered for hours on end. Then everyone retreats back to their offices and races to catch up on their work before the next meeting is called. And the cycle starts all over again.

The Scourge That is PowerPoint

And, of course, there is the ubiquitous PowerPoint presentation. There should be an addendum to the aforementioned handbook that provides for excessive punishment for anyone that misuses PowerPoint presentation software. This one product might be the single most abused business tool ever introduced into the workplace. (OK, I’ll grant you that text messaging and Blackberrys would get a lot of votes.)

SunGard, one of the world’s leading software and IT services companies, works with just about every financial services company in the world. In a recent New York Times interview, Cristóbal Conde, President & CEO of SunGard, commented on the use of PowerPoint in the workplace:

I actively despise how people use PowerPoint as a crutch. I think PowerPoint can be a way to cover up sloppy thinking, which makes it hard to differentiate between good ideas and bad ideas. I would much rather have somebody write something longhand, send it in ahead of the meeting and then assume everybody’s read it, and then you start talking, and let them defend it.

Conde’s comments suggest there are actually two major potential problems with PowerPoint presentations. First, presenters are apt to use business jargon, 12-color charts, transition effects, and text-laden slides to disguise the fact that they don’t have a firm grasp on a problem or an issue, or to hide the fact that they are uncomfortable with detailed discussion about the problem or issue. Second, presenters dramatically overuse/misuse PowerPoint to create a presentation that participants would sacrifice parts of their anatomy to avoid.

As Conde notes, “The question from the beginning of the meeting to the end of the meeting is, ‘Have we added value: yes or no?’ And I would say that if the meeting is mostly the presentation of a deck of PowerPoint slides, you conveyed information, but you didn’t actually add value.”

An Effective Meeting

Unfortunately, some people just love to have meetings. In some instances, it is a great replacement for actually getting some real work done. In most cases, however, a manager simply hasn’t learned how to lead a productive meeting. So, let’s review the basics.

There are three parts of a meeting that must be done well for it to yield positive results: First, there is what happens before the meeting (the Agenda), then there is what happens during the meeting (the Leader), and finally, there is what happens after the meeting (the Follow-up). In fact, it is the follow-up process that ensures that all the heavy lifting done before and during the actual meeting results in good decisions and accountability.

Here are eight steps to follow that will help any manager produce shorter, more effective meetings:

  1. Create an objective for the meeting (Before)
  2. Create a specific agenda for the meeting (Before)
  3. Ensure that any contributor to the meeting is fully aware of his/her individual role in the meeting (Before)
  4. Establish a firm time frame for the meeting (Before)
  5. Assign a note-taker for the meeting (Before)
  6. Record all decisions, action items, and critical information (During)
  7. Assign process owners to all action items (During)
  8. Distribute notes immediately following the meeting (After)

As you can see, the success or failure of any meeting is largely determined before the meeting even starts. The first five steps are all about planning for an effective meeting (a novel idea, to be sure).  The balance of the steps are simply about good execution.

While a meeting is only as good as its agenda and follow-up process, the leader will ultimately determine the overall effectiveness of the meeting. Frankly, setting an agenda and distributing the notes after the meeting is not terribly difficult, but, if the agenda is poorly conceived or the notes outline a series of bad decisions or faulty action items, the meeting will ultimately be considered a failure.

And, if the meeting includes one or more of those PowerPoint monstrosities, you can bet your last dollar that meeting length is going up and meeting effectiveness is going down.

{ 1 comment }

What is Your Culture Worth?

Simple question: Do employees tend to do better work in a demanding workplace culture that is positive, encouraging, and empowering, or will they do better work in a demanding workplace that is negative, critical, and constricting?
Notice that in either cases the workplace environment is demanding; i.e., expectations for performance are high, employees are accountable to [...]

Read the post here...

Eliminating Excuses (and Improving Performance)

The first thing that I learned was results matter. At the end of the day, no matter how much somebody respects your intellect or your capabilities or how much they like you, in the end it is all about results in the business context. You have to be able to demonstrate that you have proven [...]

Read the post here...

Rate Yourself on These Critical Competencies

Annual reviews are designed as a part of an overall performance management process. During the typical annual review, managers are usually assessed in a number of mission-critical competencies. Unfortunately, though well-intentioned, the typical review contains a number of flaws.
First, adequate training in assessment areas is not always forthcoming. In fact, specific competencies are not always [...]

Read the post here...

Create a Clear Mission

In a November 2009 Fast Company article entitled “How to Write a Mission Statement That Isn’t Dumb,” Nancy Lublin writes, “Mission statements are like corporate Hallmark cards. Often written in a bland cursive font and plastered conspicuously at headquarters, these aspiring epigrams are pretty words in Air Supply-like rhythm.” Need proof? Here’s a fairly standard [...]

Read the post here...

A Manager’s Biggest Priority is…

If you insist on doing everything, that is exactly what will happen, so quit whining about your employees’ lack of initiative. The team will likely suffer high turnover; employees will tell you they got a better offer, but they really just want to work for someone that will give them a chance to grow and develop. The team will not be innovative, because the “really good” ideas always come from you.

Read the post here...

How Effective Are You at Managing Performance?

News flash: In terms of workplace performance, employees aren’t all the same.  Yup…bet you had no idea.
Of course, it would be nice if they were all the same – preferably awesome. Unfortunately, we have all seen the employee who has been with the company for ten years but really doesn’t have ten years experience, [...]

Read the post here...

Which Part of “Communication” Don’t You Understand?

How important is it for a manager to be an effective communicator in the workplace? The most recent data suggests that, for corporate recruiters looking to hire for management positions, communication skills rank at the top of the list of core competencies managers need in the workplace:
Good communication skills outrank other core business competencies as [...]

Read the post here...

Should Employee Engagement Even Be a Priority?

I recently read a Blog post entitled “Why Engagement May be the Best Management Voodoo Ever.” As I worked through the article, I also worked my way rapidly through a range of emotions – from curiosity to irritation to anger to defensiveness to understanding and, finally, back to curiosity. The author, Wally Bock, posits that [...]

Read the post here...