Are You Dreaming?

by Kelly Riggs on January 2, 2012

Goals and objectives get a whole lot of attention this time of year. Companies create new revenue objectives; individuals resolve to do something differently. This oversimplifies things a bit, but you get the general idea. The New Year is the time to initiate change, raise the bar, create new challenges, make things happen.

Companies decide to increase sales. Develop new marketing plans. Introduce new product lines. Open new locations.

Individuals want to lose weight. Get in shape. Start a new hobby. Work on the house.

Unfortunately, it is estimated that as many as 80 percent of New Year’s resolutions end in dismal failure – before January is even two weeks old. And, although accurate data on the success of corporate goal-setting is difficult to find, I suspect the results may not be considerably better. Why? Because what most people and most companies believe to be “goals” are really nothing more than pipe dreams.

Which of the following two statements are most likely to result in progress?

1. I need to start running.

2. I will run two miles immediately after work, three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday) in 11 minutes or less, for eight weeks. I will record my times and assess my progress weekly.

One is a dream, or, at best, a good idea. The other is a defined and measurable plan. And that, in a nutshell, is the difference between success and failure in goal-setting. To reach an objective of any complexity requires a clear and specific understanding of how that objective will be reached. Successful goal-setters don’t simply visualize an objective, they create a detailed, step-by-step, measurable process for reaching that objective.

The same problem occurs in the corporate world. Instead of a specific objective and detailed plans, the company gets a number to shoot for. Someone at the top decides on a lofty objective – a 20% increase in sales, for example – and everyone is encouraged to do their part to make it happen. In some cases, there may even be a “strategic planning” session where key personnel debate a number of tactics that may (or may not) help the company reach the objective.

The problem is that a number is not a strategy. In fact, a number is not even a goal until you put a plan behind it. Until then, it’s just a dream; or, at best, a decent idea.

The Importance to Your Employees

This whole idea has tremendous importance for you, certainly, but it is also extremely important for your employees. Clear goals and measurable progress, as it turns out, are crucial components of employee engagement. Teresa Amabile and Steve Kramer discussed this idea in a recent HBR article:

To get yourself and your team off to a good start for the new year, focus on progress. Our research discovered that fostering progress in meaningful work is the most important way to keep people highly engaged at work — even if that progress is a “small win”.

We call this phenomenon the progress principle; it works because people want to feel that they are contributing to something that matters.

This time of year is the perfect opportunity to review career and workplace goals with each of your employees. However, to make the process effective, resist the urge to simply discuss the employee’s past performance, or to just throw out a couple of important-sounding objectives to consider for the New Year. Instead, identify one or more specific career and/or workplace objectives and create a clear game plan for attaining those objectives. Create milestones – the “small wins” – that define progress. Create clear metrics so performance or improvement can be assessed at regular intervals.

And, if you’re not exactly sure how to create clear goals and defined plans, make that your New Year’s resolution, but give yourself a chance: Quit hoping. Start planning™.

{ 0 comments }

Tell Me What You Think (But Not Really)

by Kelly Riggs on December 22, 2011

Leadership experts believe that an effective leader should be open to dissent or differing opinions. Jim Collins, for example, said the following in Good to Great:

“Leadership is about vision – but it is equally important to create a climate where truth is heard and brutal facts are confronted.”

In other words, a good leader is one who will create a workplace environment where employees feel free to disagree, say what they think, or push back on specific ideas or initiatives. Such a practice, it is believed, helps to create an environment of transparency, openness, and trust.

Which sounds great. Right up until the time the leader’s ideas or opinions are actually questioned. As it turns out, there is a bit of difference between talking about disagreement and actually having someone question your decisions. Those in charge often tend to perceive dissent or disagreement as disrespectful. Or argumentative. Or completely inappropriate (“Perhaps you should get more than two years of experience before you start criticizing my decisions!”) More than a few times, I have seen leaders get irritated, even angry, when an employee offers resistance or challenges the boss’s ideas. Even if they have been encouraged to do exactly that.

This doesn’t mean that Collins is off-base. It just means that this idea is a little more difficult than one might suppose. To successfully create an environment where the “brutal facts are confronted” requires much more than a simple edict by the boss (“I want you guys to challenge me!”). It requires a long-term investment in the manager-employee relationship, because people will typically disagree with people they don’t know at all (and don’t care if they see again), or with people whom they feel comfortable offering their own opinions. It takes a strong relationship to feel comfortable enough to offer a conflicting idea, especially if the person you are contradicting is the boss.

“You Can’t Handle the Truth”

A Few Good Men. Great movie. Nicholson’s famous line has been used and re-used in every conceivable part of our society, and it definitely applies to the workplace. Quite often, managers simply can’t handle the truth. There are, in fact, at least three things that can derail this idea of “creat[ing] a climate where truth is heard”: 1) A lack of maturity in the boss, 2) A lack of trust between the boss and employees, and 3) A failure to understand the motives of employees.

First, an immature boss can react completely wrong to an employee who offers a contradictory opinion, and that will be the end of that. Want proof? Suggest to your employees that they need to challenge your thinking. When they do, get irritated. Roll your eyes. Throw out a couple of sarcastic comments to show them who’s boss. Argue your point – hard – without trying to understand their perspectives. It won’t take more than once or twice to shut down any opposition you encounter.

Second, no employee is likely to challenge a boss that is not trusted. A lack of trust is the invisible enemy of a high-performance workplace, and it is often created by little things we fail to pay attention to. Failure to follow-through. Lack of consistency. Poor decision-making. Selfishness. Inadequate communication. In the absence of trust, very few people will venture out onto a limb to disagree with the boss.

Third, in the right environment, people may actually be willing to offer contrary ideas, but the boss still needs to understand the context of the disagreement. Sometimes dissent is simply resistance to needed change. Sometimes dissent is a negative response to new responsibilities. Sometimes dissent may reflect a lack of understanding of the bigger picture. When employees push back against your ideas or current workplace practices, it makes a world of difference to know whether the employee is presenting a plausible alternative or simply lobbying to avoid something he or she doesn’t care to do.

So, it takes a special kind of leader to encourage dissent. A leader who is competent, yet willing to learn. Confident, yet willing to listen. Strong-willed, yet humble. Which, by some coincidence, is exactly the kind of leader employees love to work for. A recent Washington Post article cites research by noted psychologist Robert Hogan with regard to leadership:

“According to Hogan’s research, followers want four things: integrity, confidence, decision-making and clarity. But just as important is what followers don’t want: irritability, moodiness, untrustworthiness, indec­i­sive­­­ness, needless micro-management and excessive authority. They perceive these things as incompetent, and pretty soon the leveling mechanism kicks in and there is a subtle rebellion.”

If you want to benefit from your employees ideas and perspectives, start by creating the right environment. Get to know your people. Set clear expectations. Follow through. Spend more time asking questions than showing them what you know. Something will begin to happen. Once employees perceive you as competent, fair, and willing to listen, you won’t have to ask your people to offer up new ideas – they just will.

{ 2 comments }